Idaho
Attorney General Tries To Escape Idaho Supreme Court Ruling
on
Free Exercise of Religion Protected SSN Case
H. Lance
Freeman
American Christian Liberty
Society
April 21, 2006
Larry Lewis has been trying to get a driver's license for about four
years now. His application was denied by the Idaho Department of
Transportation and Larry has appealed his case to the Idaho Supreme
Court. The Idaho Attorney General argued vehemently that Section
666 of Volume 42 of the United States Code mandates that Idaho require
Mr. Lewis to identify himself with a Social Security Number, and that
the Dept. of Transp. was justified in denying Mr. Lewis a license
because he refused to put an SSN on his driver's license
application. Though Mr. Lewis's religious convictions prohibit
him from participation in Social Security and from identifying with an
SSN, the Attorney General argued that the federal welfare deadbeat dad
provision of Section 666 supersedes any protection from the Idaho Free
Exercise of Religion Protected statute (FERP) as well as the Idaho
Constitution.
Well renowned Constitutional litigator Herb Titus came to Larry's aid
late into the Idaho Supreme Court proceedings. Herb Titus
submitted Larry's reply brief to the Attorney General's written
argument. Mr. Titus's argument supported what Mr. Lewis had been
saying all along, that there is no compelling interest for the Idaho
Department of Transportation to deny Mr. Lewis's particular request for
religious accommodation. After a February 21, 2006, strong ruling
in the United States Supreme Court on a parallel issue, Mr. Titus
submitted a supplemental brief that pointed out that the recent U.S.
Supreme Court ruling supported Mr. Lewis's position and strongly
opposed the position taken by the Idaho Attorney General [Gonzalez v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do
Vegetal (Feb. 21, 2006)].
Feeling the weight of the legal arguments against him, the Deputy
Attorney General
J. Tim Thomas made a surprising motion in an apparent attempt to evade a
Idaho Supreme Court ruling against the government. Mr. Thomas,
contradicting his prior arguments, told the Court that Section 666 did
not actually mandate that Mr. Lewis state his SSN on the driver's
license application. Then he proposed an interesting innovation
that would get the case out of the Court but still have the government
satisfy their desire to have Mr. Lewis identify with an SSN. Mr.
Thomas moved that the Court send the case back to the Department of
Transportation with instructions for them to identify Mr. Lewis with a
SSN , effectively behind his back, by placing in the driver's license
record a SSN previously associated with Mr. Lewis.
This week, Herb Titus submitted a reply to the Attorney General remand
motion. The reply is clearly designed to hold the Idaho
Attorney General's feet to the fire regarding whether or not the Idaho
Free Exercise of Religious Protected statute will keep Mr. Lewis from
having to forego a driver's license if he will not forgo his faith (Reply in Opposition to Motion to Remand).
Oral argument in scheduled for June 8th, 2006 at the Supreme Court
building in Boise, Idaho.
Lewis v. Idaho Dept. of Trans.
Supplemental Brief
Lewis Supplement
Cover Sheet
Lewis Table of Contents &
Authorities
Lewis Supplement Argument Text
www.christianliberty.org